In partnership with

Your best channel is telling you to spend more. Before Q4, that is the trap.

We manage paid media for a living, so weigh this accordingly. The channel showing your best ROAS is usually where your next dollar buys the least growth.

Our co-founder Niket spent Wednesday at Snap's Performance Summit in New York. One number from the opening talk is worth your morning.

Sid Malhotra's team traced the last $5M they spent on a saturated platform and found almost none of it was incremental. Those customers were going to buy anyway. The ad account still reported a healthy return on every one of them.

Past the saturation point, ROAS stops measuring growth and starts counting the customers you already had. The number keeps climbing while the new-customer count flattens underneath it. Last-click can't tell the two apart, so it keeps recommending you feed the channel that looks best.

Now set that against what you are paying. Meta CPMs are running north of 20% above last year on identical campaigns (we see this in 1st party Acceler8 client data), and Northbeam sees the same in aggregate. The premium to reach each person is up, and a growing share of those people already know you.

The question Sid put to the room is the one to carry into your next budget meeting. Where does the next dollar create growth you would not have gotten anyway?

Snap's pitch for being that next dollar rests on reach rather than demographics. Around 40% of its US users are not on TikTok on a given day, a third are not on Instagram, and the platform is built outward from private messaging instead of a public feed. Whether that unduplicated reach holds for your brand is a test, not a belief.

One brand ran it.

Comfort, an apparel company saturating on other channels, ran a Snap incrementality study and found 79% of the customers it acquired were net new. Higher revenue, higher return, because the buyers weren't already sitting in the funnel somewhere else.

None of this means moving budget to Snap. It means two decisions sit above your Q4 media plan, and both belong to you rather than your media buyer.

Approve one funded incrementality test on an earlier-curve channel, with a holdout, before the holidays. Not "let's try Snap." A test with a real budget and a control group that can prove net-new customers rather than reshuffled ones. Wait until January to learn your winner was non-incremental, and you spent the whole Q4 premium re-buying people you already had.

Change the number your agency reports upward. American Eagle's team prefixes every KPI with an "i," incremental only. Ask your agency for new-customer count and incremental return next to the blended ROAS, this week. A slow answer tells you the blended number was doing more flattering than reporting.

A third question is quieter but real. Is the creative you would run on a new channel actually built for it? Kitsch's team said the thing every operator knows and few admit, that Meta creative reposted to Snap mostly dies on arrival.

If you want a second set of eyes on where your next dollar is actually incremental before you commit Q4, that's what we do. The cheapest time to find a non-incremental channel is before you fund it for the holidays.

You are paying to discover what your own feed already told you

One Q4 line item is worth a second look before it gets spent: the budget you set aside to test creative.

Most brands fund a block of paid spend every quarter to A/B their way toward a winning ad. Gary Vaynerchuk, on stage at the summit, argued you are buying data you already have.

Organic content is the cleanest creative test available, and it costs nothing. When a post pulls outsized organic reach, the algorithm is telling you the idea resonates before you have spent a dollar to find out. His play is to take that organic winner and post-produce it for performance, adding the offer and the native format, then put paid behind it. He claims it beats anything A/B tested from scratch.

His line for the room was blunt.

The math is becoming a commodity, the creative is the variable. Every buyer now has the same optimization tools, so what separates results is the asset, and your organic feed is already scoring your assets for free.

There is an underpriced version of this on Snap specifically. Spotlight, its short-form surface, gets a fraction of the attention marketers pour into Reels and TikTok, which keeps the cost of winning there low. An organic win on Spotlight, then amplified with paid on the same platform, outperforms slicing one clip five ways across channels.

The decision here is small and worth making before Q4 creative budgets lock. Ask whoever owns content which organic posts overperformed in the last ninety days, and whether any of them ever made it into paid. If organic and paid are run by two people who never compare notes, you are funding a test your own audience already ran.

Blu Dot surpasses 2,000% ROAS with self-serve CTV ads

Home furniture brand Blu Dot blew up on CTV with help from Roku Ads Manager. Here’s how:

After a test campaign reached 211,000 households and achieved 1,010% ROAS, the brand went all in to promote its annual sales event. It removed age and income constraints to expand reach and shifted budget to custom audiences and retargeting, where intent was strongest.

The results speak for themselves. As Blu Dot increased their investment by 10x, ROAS jumped to 2,308% and more page-view conversions surpassed 50,000.

“For CTV campaigns, Roku has been a top performer,” said Claire Folkestad, Paid Media Strategist, Blu Dot. “Comping to our other platforms, we have seen really strong ROAS… and highly efficient CPMs, lower than any other CTV partner we've worked with.”

Using Roku Ads Manager, the campaign moved from a pilot to a permanent performance engine for the brand.

Quick Takes

Ads in chat are live, and a creator's voice doubled them Snap turned on advertising inside private messaging, and sponsored messages sent by a creator performed twice as well as standard chat ads. The decision worth making: does your Q4 test list include a private, conversational placement, or are you still only buying public feeds? Brands that learn a new placement early pay less for it than the ones waiting for someone else's case study.

If you have physical stores, Snap Maps is an underpriced traffic lever American Eagle became the first fashion retailer to run Promoted Places, at roughly a $1 CPM, and its Maps placements drove strong store-visit return. For a hybrid retailer measuring online and offline together, that is a cheap store-traffic test the online-only playbook never surfaces. Ask whether anyone on your team owns store visits as a paid-media outcome, or whether it falls in the gap between marketing and retail ops.

Live shopping is a Q1 conversation, not a Q4 one Vaynerchuk's biggest prediction was live social commerce, the QVC model on every platform, with TikTok Live, Whatnot and eBay Live already moving real GMV. Nothing to act on for the holidays. Put it on the Q1 roadmap as a question about who owns it, before a competitor in your category answers first.

The Last Word

The uncomfortable part of the incrementality conversation is what it says about the reports you already trust.

A saturated channel and a growing one can post the same ROAS, and the one you keep funding is usually the one flattering last quarter rather than building the next one. Snap spent a whole summit selling its own real estate, and you can discount the pitch without losing the idea underneath it.

Heading into the most expensive acquisition window of the year, spending harder on the channel that already looks best is the comfortable move.

The money is in the customers your current mix keeps missing.

Know someone who should be reading this?

If this was useful, forward it to one person managing media budgets who doesn't have time to read everything. That's exactly who this is for.